metabolic energy (EM), 8.6% crude protein, 3.9% fat, 2% crude fiber 0.02% calcium and 0.1% phosphorus. In addition,
functions to reduce total cholesterol (TCHO), LDL levels and blood glucose. Another advantage of corn is that it contains
vitamin A or carotenoid and vitamin E which functions as natural antioxidants that can increase the body's immunity and
can inhibit degenerative cells. The content of several essential minerals, such as K, Na, P, Ca and Fe are also found in
corn.
Several previous studies have shown that replacing some commercial rations with corn does not reduce chicken
performance. For instance, Puspani et al. (2011) revealed that substitution commercial feed up to 20% with corn did not
feed with corn up to 40% did not adverse growth and FCR in native chickens. Furthermore, Munira et al. (2016) in their
research results reported that there were no significant difference on feed intake, body weight gain (BWG), carcass weight
and carcass percentage of super native chickens when fed fermented 10% rice bran in ration compared to control. These
findings indicate that one alternative that can be done in an effort to reduce the cost of raising chickens both broilers and
native chickens is to replace some commercial rations with energy source feed ingredients.
To our knowledge, there have been no reports regarding the effect of substitution of commercial feed with corn on
performance and plasma TCHO in KUB chicken. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of
substitution of commercial feed with corn on performance and plasma TCHO in KUB chickens. In addition, evaluation of
corn energy source for economical broiler production also was evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This research was carried out at the Poultry Division Field Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture and Animal Science, State
Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia in 2018.
Ethical approval
Chickens were handled and managed accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of
Animal, at the Faculty of Agriculture and Animal Science, State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Pekanbaru,
Indonesia.
Animals and ration
This study used 50 DOC KUB chickens purchased from local breeding farms and placed in 2 enclosures (25 per plot).
All birds were distributed with uniform body weight and water was provided ad-libitum. One day before the experiment.
Placement of chickens into the cage was done randomly. Chicken was put into the cage done two weeks after the cage
was cleaned and washed. Likewise, the treatment was given randomly. The size of the enclosure for each unit is 75 cm x
60 cm width and 60 cm height. Each cage was equipped with a ration container and drinking water container. This study
consisted of 2 treatments, each consisting of 25 chickens. The treatment ration and water were given ad libitum. Chicken
were raised for 10 weeks. Experimental rations consisted of two treatments, namely 100% of commercial feed and 70%
commercial feed + 30% corn. The commercial feed was purchased from PT Charoon Pokphan Ltd, Pekanbaru (Table 1),
while the composition of nutrient content of treatment is shown in Table 2. The parameters measured were performance
including feed intake, (BWG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR), concentration of TCHO in blood plasma.
Table 2 - The percentage of nutrient content of Corn and Commercial ration
Nutrient
Corn*
Commercial ration
Crude Protein (%)
Crude Fiber (%)
Crude Fat (%)
Ca (%)
P (%)
ME (Kcal/kg)
8.6
2
3.9
0.02
0.1
3,370
23.50
1.88
5.87
0.29
0.15
3,050
* Scott et al. (1982). Ca: Calcium, P: Phosphor, ME: Metabolizable Energy; *Commercial feed: CP511 PT, Charoen Pokphand, Indonesia;
**Mineral Premix: Supplemented for kg of the diets: Vit. A, 12000 IU; D3, 2000 IU; E, 20 mg; K3, 3 mg; B2, 7 mg; B3, 12 mg; B5, 3 mg; B12,
0.03 mg; biotin, 0.1 mg; choline chloride, 300 mg; Mn, 130 mg; Fe, 70 mg; Zn, 60 mg; Cu,12 mg; I,1 mg; Se, 0.2 mg, and adequate antioxidant.
Table 2 - Composition of nutrient content of treatment
Nutrient
100% of Commercial feed
70% commercial feed + 30% corn
Crude Protein (%)
Crude Fiber (%)
Crude Fat (%)
23.50
1.88
5.87
22.01
4.21
7.42
ME (Kcal/kg)
3,050
3,055
186
Citation: Erwan E (2020). Effects of substitution of corn for commercial ration on performance and plasma cholesterol in KUB chicken. Online J. Anim. Feed Res., 10(4):
185-190.