Volume 10, Issue 6: 282-289; November 27, 2020  
ON-FARM MONITORING OF GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF  
INDIGENOUS GOAT IN AMHARA REGION OF ETHIOPIA  
Kefyalew GOLLA1, Yeshambel MEKURIAW2, Birhan KASSA3 , Mussie HAILEMELEKOT2  
1South Gonder Zone Office of Agriculture, PO Box 550, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia  
2Bahir Dar University, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, PO Box 550, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia  
3Andassa Livestock Research Center, P.O. Box 27, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia  
Email: birhankassa56@gmail.com;  
Supporting Information  
ABSTRACT: The study was conducted in Amhara region of Ethiopia, with the objective of characterizing the goat  
husbandry practice and on-farm monitoring of growth performance. The data were collected by interviewing 180  
sample households who are selected purposively from three agro ecologies using semi- structured questioner.  
Besides, on farm monitoring of growth performance of 60 kids owned by farmers was done for three months.  
The data was analyzed using SPSS (version 20). Majority of households (68.9%) have an experiences of feeding  
crop residue for their goat and faced feed shortage mainly during dry season (65.6%). The main source of water  
for goat was river which is 51.1% in wet season and 88.9% in dry season. 51.7% of goat keepers had a separate  
goat house. The major disease reported were anthrax (40.6%), goat pox (26.7%) and foot and mouth disease  
(12.8). Purpose of goat keeping was mainly for income source (62.8%). 84.4% of the goat owners are  
experienced selection of male and female animal for production purpose. Body length and height (60.6%) and  
color (34.4%) were used as major selection criteria. Higher kidding was reported during months of October  
(20.55%), November (39.44%) and December (18.88%). Drought (42%), shortage of feed and water (38.5%),  
disease and parasite (16%), inconvenient climate condition (2%) and lack of breeding male (1%) were reported  
as major problems in the breeding objective. The overall birth weight, 60 days and 90 days weight of kids was  
1.69±0.08 kg, 7.45±0.41 kg and 12.02±0.25 kg, respectively. The survival rate of kids up to 90 days of age was  
74%. The production system of the area was characterized by mixed crop-livestock farming system on which  
crop residue was the main feed source of the goats as other livestock species. Even though the current  
productivity of goats in the area is fairly good, full potential need to be exploited by improving husbandry  
practices, applying appropriate disease prevention methods and applying strategic forage development and  
feeding practices.  
Keywords: Birth weight, Husbandry practices, Indigenous goats, On-farm monitoring, Survival rate  
INTRODUCTION  
In Ethiopia; almost all goats are managed under extensive traditional systems and produce the lowest compared to other  
sub-Saharan African countries (Tesfahun et al., 2017). Ethiopian indigenous goats are genetically less productive as  
compared to temperate breeds (Mohammed et al., 2012; Abraham et al., 2018). Goats are important for diversified  
production, creating employment, increasing income, building capital, contributing to human nutrition and reducing risk,  
in efforts made so far to improve the productivity of indigenous goats is very little as compared to the concerns given to  
other livestock species such as cattle and sheep (Solomon et al., 2010). Despite the huge resource potential, production  
and export opportunities, goat production in Ethiopia is relatively undeveloped. There is considerable potential for goat  
production in the country, where goat milk and skin are valued commodities (ESGPIP, 2008; Mayberry et al., 2018).  
Indigenous goats can inhabit a wide range of climates (Bangley, 2006) and have a huge socio-economic importance  
(FAO, 1999). For their small body size, goats have physical and bio-physical advantages over large ruminants. In recent  
years, it is increasingly becoming physically and bio-physically impossible to keep dairy and beef cattle in highly populated  
highlands of Ethiopia. Dairy goats, therefore, offer alternative to dairy cattle in such areas in Africa (Mohamed et al.,  
2002; Alemayehu and Kebede, 2017; Kahi and Wasike, 2019). The growing demand for meat from small ruminants,  
improving infrastructure (transport and information technology), and improvement in small ruminant husbandry  
techniques among producers provide opportunities to enhance the contribution of goats to smallholder farmers’  
livelihoods (Getahun, 2008). The current contribution of goats to the country’s economy and producers livelihoods is  
however still below the total potential production capacity (Girma et al., 2000). Given the large population size with  
diverse breeds and their wide distribution across various agro-ecological zones and production systems, there is a huge  
potential to utilize goats to raise the socio-economic status of producers by improving goat productivity (Girma et al.  
2000; Sheriff et al., 2020). Tach Gayint district is a place in which 23.7 % of the district is “Kola” (lowland) and 63.2% is  
“Woyna Dega” /mid land/ which is suitable for small ruminant production especially for goats. However, goat production  
and productivity are challenged by shortage of feed, poor management system and disease (TGWADO, 2015). Even  
though the area has high number of goat population and potential for goat production, there is great problem in utilizing  
282  
Citation: Golla K, Mekuriaw Y, Kassa B, Hailemelekot M (2020). On-farm monitoring of growth performance of indigenous goat in Amhara region of Ethiopia. Online J.  
this resource potential optimally and more than 45% of the population living under poverty is supported by relief  
(TGWADO, 2015). This problem emanated from a number of factors such as low level of management skills, unavailability  
of inputs for goat production, needs and interests of individuals, poor agricultural practices and attitude. However, the  
above factors have not yet been extensively studied, therefore, there is a need to assess goat husbandry practices and  
productivity at farmer’s level to fill the existing problems in the area. Therefore, it is better to systematically describe the  
productivity of goats in order to plan and design appropriate research and development interventions that are relevant for  
better improvement. Therefore, this study was conducted to fill the existing information gap with regard to husbandry  
practices and productivity of goat in Tach Gayint district. Therefore, the objective of this study was characterizing the  
smallholder goat husbandry practice and on-monitoring productivity of goat under the existing management condition.  
MATERIALS AND METHODS  
Description of the study area  
The study was conducted at Tach Gayint district, Amhara region, Ethiopia. The district is located between 11º23’-  
11º44’ north latitudes, and 38º20’- 38º44’ east longitudes. It extends for about 40 kilometers in the north-south direction  
and about 44 km in the east-west direction and has a semi- compact shape and an area of 995 km2 and 82540.7 ha.  
The topography of the district consists of gorges and rugged terrain (54 %), mountains (23 %), and plain land (22%), and it  
is divided into three agro- climatic zones: “Kola” (23.7%) altitude >500, “Woyna Dega” (63%) altitude>1500 and  
“Dega”(13.1%) altitude >2300 More than 90 percent of its population lives in rural areas engaged predominantly on  
subsistence agricultural production. Agricultural production is mixed crop livestock and crop production is predominantly  
rain fed. Average annual rainfall is about 600-1000 mm. The Mean annual maximum temperature ranges between 21-  
23°C (TGDADO, 2015).  
Sampling Methods and Data Collection  
Sampling Techniques. The sampling method was multistage sampling technique. For the purpose of this study agro-  
climatic distribution of the district was used in order to stratify the Kebele in the district. Based on topography and agro-  
climate of the area, the district was divided into three strata as low land (23.7%), midland (63.2 %) and highland (13.1%),  
(TGWADO, 2015). In the second stage, a proportional allocation technique was used in order to determine the number of  
sample Kebele from each stratum. In this manner, proportionally, two Kebele from the lowland, three Kebele from the  
midland and one Kebele from the highland i.e., a total of six Kebele were selected to undertake the study. Finally,  
households used for the study were selected using simple random selection method after identifying the goat owners  
from the community. Household that has at least 3 goats were selected for the survey. Accordingly, 30 households from  
each Kebele total of 180 households were randomly selected to participate in husbandry practices and productivity study  
of goats.  
Data Sources. Both primary and secondary data were used on various aspects of goat husbandry practices. The  
primary data were collected from sample respondents through structured and semi structured questionnaire and through  
monitoring on growth of goats. The questionnaire covers various aspects of goat husbandry practice. Structured  
questionnaire was used to collect information on the following variables: purposes of keeping goats, feeds and feeding,  
breeding systems, housing, diseases and parasites and veterinary services. Secondary data were obtained from district  
Agricultural Development Office, Zonal Agricultural Department, NGOs and other published and unpublished sources. For  
data collection, development agents (DA’s) working in the district were recruited, intensively trained and administered the  
questionnaire for 180 selected households in selected six Kebeles under the close supervision of the researcher.  
Focus group discussion  
In addition to informal survey collect qualitative data through focus group discussion before conducting the survey.  
Three focus group discussions were held at each agro-ecology with 9-12 key informants selected from the area,  
mainly the elders and those who have experienced goat keepers.  
Flock monitoring  
The study also includes monitoring of the, birth weight, pre -weaning growth rate and survival rate of kids. To make  
these monitoring 20 households from the three Kebeles of different agro ecologies (a total of sixty does) that have late  
pregnant goats were selected purposively from each three agro-ecologies by the researcher and development agents. The  
monitoring was done for three months. The birth weight of the kids was taken as soon as they are born using spring  
balance. The subsequent weight of kids was taken at 15 days interval and the analysis was made for birth weight, 60  
days and 90 days weight. The live weight measurement was taken before feeding and watering and survival rate of kids  
was recorded starting from their birth.  
Data analysis  
The collected data was organized, summarized and analyzed using SPSS statistical package (SPSS version 20). A  
one-way analysis of variance was applied for quantitative dependent variable by a single factor (independent) variable  
283  
Citation: Golla K, Mekuriaw Y, Kassa B, Hailemelekot M (2020). On-farm monitoring of growth performance of indigenous goat in Amhara region of Ethiopia. Online J.  
such as livestock holdings, mortality rate, and flock dynamics. The difference between means was separated via Tukey  
HSD. In addition to this, General Linear Model (GLM) procedures were used to analysis the monitoring data. The following  
model was used:  
Yjkl = μ + Si + Bj + Pk + Al + eijkl  
Where:  
Yjkl = Observation (birth weight, pre- weaning growth) ithsex thejth birth type born in the kth parity and the lth agro  
ecology  
μ = the overall mean common to all animals in the study  
Si = fixed effects of the ith sex (1=male, 2=female)  
Bj = fixed effects of the jth birth type (1= single, 2= multiple)  
Pk = fixed effects of the kth parity (p= 1, 2, 3 and >4)  
Al = fixed effect of the lth agro-ecology (highland, midland and lowland)  
ejkl = is the random error  
RESULTS and DISCUSSION  
Husbandry practices  
Housing: Goats were mainly housed during rainy season; unlike other livestock species they were housed on fenced  
barn at the homestead. While, if the number was small they also commonly housed with sheep and other cattle inside a  
house. Respondents indicated that they had a separate goat house (51.7%), and a house attached to the main a house  
(36.7%), crash (8.9%), and ground of the main house (1.7%) and in the main house (1.1%) to shelter their goat (table 8).  
And majority of the respondents indicated that they separately housed fattening and young kids in the house. This might  
be due to giving of special care for them to fatten in short period of time and to follow the growth of kids, respectively.  
Majority of the respondents (85%) responds that as they clean the house of goats daily. The remaining cleans the  
house/barn once a week, twice a week and three times a week. Majority of the respondents (97.2% in wet season and  
85% in dry season) indicated that they clean the barn daily (Table 2).  
Table 1 - Type of house used for goat production  
Type of housing  
Frequency  
Percent  
In the main house  
2
66  
93  
16  
3
1.1  
36.7  
51.7  
8.9  
1.7  
100.0  
A house attached to the main house  
A separately constructed sheep and goat house  
Crash /barn/  
Ground of the main house  
Total  
180  
Table 2 - Hygienic practice of the barn in the study area  
Hygienic practice of the barn  
Dry season  
Frequency  
Wet season  
Percent  
Frequency  
Percent  
Daily  
Once per week  
153  
4
85.0  
2.2  
175  
2
97.2  
1.1  
Twice per week  
Three times per week  
Monthly  
Not clean /only changing the barn  
Total  
7
11  
2
3
180  
3.9  
6.1  
1.2  
1.7  
1
2
180  
0.6  
1.1  
100.0  
100.0  
Feeds and Feeding  
From the total respondents 68.9% of them reported that they have experience of feeding crop residue for their goats,  
while 31.1% didn’t have experience of feeding of crop residue for their goats. The main reason for low level of feeding of  
crop residue was unavailability (24.4%) and not accepted by goats (6.1%). The major crop residues reported were pea  
straw (37.2%) and haricot bean straw (22.8%). About 77.8% of interviewed farmers indicated that they have experienced  
feed shortage for their goats. Shortage of feed was reported during dry season (65.6%), rainy season (2.2%) and  
throughout the year (11.1%); and the others had enough feed throughout the year. As a main reason the feed shortage  
was due to shrinkage and declining in productivity of grazing land (34.4%), cultivation, settlement and protection on  
284  
Citation: Golla K, Mekuriaw Y, Kassa B, Hailemelekot M (2020). On-farm monitoring of growth performance of indigenous goat in Amhara region of Ethiopia. Online J.  
grazing land (15%), drought (17.8%) and an increase in human population (6.7%). The survey revealed that 77.2% of them  
let their animals to graze/browse with other flocks; while the others didn’t let their goats to graze. 56.1% of the  
respondents indicated that they supplement their goats during dry season, wet season and throughout the year with  
respective percentage of 43.3%, 2.2% and 10.6%. Farmers which were not supplementing because they didn’t have  
accessibility of concentrate feeds and expensiveness of concentrate feeds.  
Table 3- Major crop residues used for feeding of goats in Tach Gayint district  
Major crop residues  
Teff straw  
Pea straw  
Wheat straw  
Haricot bean straw  
Lentil straw  
Percent respondents  
3.9  
37.2  
2.8  
22.8  
0.6  
Vetch straw  
1.7  
Chick pea straw  
2.2  
Table 4 - Seasonal Grazing/browsing system for goats in Tach Gayint district  
Grazing system  
Free grazing  
Dry season (%)  
46.2  
Wet season (%)  
18.9  
22.2  
58.9  
Partial grazing /tethered grazing  
Zero grazing /tethered grazing  
39.4  
14.4  
Table 5 - Reasons for non-supplementing respondents in the study districts  
Reasons for non-supplementation of concentrate feeds  
Not accessible  
Frequency  
Percent  
35.6  
6.1  
64  
11  
14  
Expensive  
Not want to offer sheep and goats  
7.8  
Water source and watering frequency:  
The respondents revealed that the major water sources for their goat were sourced from river 51.1% in rainy season  
and 88.9% in dry season (Table 6). As the respondents revealed, during rainy season watering was once because many of  
the grass were fresh that holds water and during dry season watering frequency was twice and once a day (Table 7).  
Table 6 - Water source in dry and wet season for goats in Tach Gayint district  
Source of water  
Percent in wet season  
Percent in dry season  
River  
Pond  
51.1  
1.1  
88.9  
-
Rain water  
Water harvest  
Deep well  
Pipe  
19.4  
1.7  
5.6  
-
-
2.2  
-
0.6  
Spring  
20.6  
8.9  
Table 7- Watering frequency in dry and wet season for goats in Tach Gayint district  
Wet season  
Dry season  
Watering frequency  
Frequency  
Percent  
Frequency  
Percent  
Any time required  
Once a day  
Twice a day  
Every three days  
Total  
92  
71  
12  
5
51.1  
39.4  
6.7  
2.8  
100.0  
16  
126  
37  
1
180  
8.9  
70.0  
20.6  
0.6  
180  
100.0  
285  
Citation: Golla K, Mekuriaw Y, Kassa B, Hailemelekot M (2020). On-farm monitoring of growth performance of indigenous goat in Amhara region of Ethiopia. Online J.  
Goat diseases and vaccination strategy:  
The major diseases reported by the farmers were anthrax (40.6%) goat pox (26.7%) and foot and mouth disease  
(12.8) (Table 8). The reported diseases mainly occurred during long drought following floods and after small rainy season  
(Bett et al., 2017). Anthrax, foot and mouth diseases, Internal and External parasite were also reported on the same  
working area by Assefa et al. (2015) and PPR as a major goat disease was also reported by Wondwosen (2007). The  
reported diseases affect all age group of goat flock (73.3%) following pregnant does and new born kids. Majority of the  
respondents (96.7%) treat their sick animals by collecting medicaments from the public veterinarian clinic; the remaining  
respondents visit private clinics. About 86.1% of the respondents indicated that they have an access for veterinary service  
within 1-10 km from their homestead. About 53.9% (n=97) respondents indicated that their goats received vaccine in  
recent times where as 46.1% (n=83) of respondents revealed that they didn’t receive a vaccination. As indicated by 51.1%  
respondents, had face their goat death in this year and majority of death was reported during March which might be due  
to the short rainy season occurred in the area (Figure 1).  
Table 8 - Common goat disease and parasites in Tach Gayint district  
Major disease  
Anthrax  
Goat pox  
Foot and mouth disease (FMD)  
Number  
73  
Percent respondents  
40.6  
26.7  
12.8  
5.6  
48  
23  
10  
Nematodes /round worm/  
PPR  
2
1.1  
Total  
159  
88.3  
14  
12  
10  
8
6
4
2
0
September October November December January Feburary  
March  
April  
May  
June  
july  
Augest  
Months  
Figure 1 - Monthly Goat death reported in Tach Gayint district  
Breeding objective  
Purpose of keeping goats. Respondents indicated that they keep goat on their herd for many purposes from which  
income source through selling of the live goat is the major one (Table 9). From the focus group discussion result, it was  
observed that farmers also keep goats for different miscellaneous purposes viz. for dowry, social heritage and for other  
cultural values.  
Selection criteria’s and trait preference in goat production. From the total respondents, 84.4% of them experienced  
selection of male and female animal for production purpose. And 62.8% of respondents indicated that they had kept  
breeding male goat in their flock and the remaining 37.2% use neighboring goats and any buck in the field for mating of  
their doe. From the total farmers, 34.4% of them reported that they experienced color as basic selection criteria on goat  
production system (Table 10). And the main selective color by the community was reddish white (23.3%), red (8.3%),  
white (5.6%) and the combination of these all (47.8%). In the goat production system, kidding occurred throughout the  
year with varying response (Figure 2). Higher kidding was reported during October, November and December months with  
respective percentage of 20.55%, 39.44% and 18.88%. This might be due that in these months there is better grazing  
land, green grass and crop residues. In the breeding objective of the area, the major constraints those hinder productivity  
of goats were summarized in (Figure 3). Respondent’s experiences culling of goats in their flock (45%) and the remaining  
52.8% hadn’t experience culling of goats in their flock. As the respondents indicate the culling criteria’s of goats in the  
flock were old age, sickness, reproductive problem, physical defect, unwanted color, and others with respective  
percentage of 16.1%, 19.4%, 2.8%, 5%, 2.8% and 3.3%.  
286  
Citation: Golla K, Mekuriaw Y, Kassa B, Hailemelekot M (2020). On-farm monitoring of growth performance of indigenous goat in Amhara region of Ethiopia. Online J.  
Table 9 - Purpose of keeping goats in the study district  
Purposes  
Frequency  
Percent  
62.8  
32.2  
5.0  
100.0  
Sale/income source  
113  
58  
9
Sale/income source and for meat  
Sale/income source, for meat and manure  
Total  
180  
Table 10 - Major selection criteria’s of goat in the production system of the working district  
Selection criterion  
Color  
Tail  
Frequency  
Percent  
34.4  
2.8  
62  
5
Body length and height  
Have no criteria  
Total  
109  
4
180  
60.6  
2.3  
100.0  
45  
40  
35  
30  
25  
20  
15  
10  
5
0
October November December January  
20.55 39.44 18.88 3.33  
June  
2.77  
July  
March September  
0.55 11.66  
April  
1.11  
May  
1.11  
Percent recpondent  
0.55  
Figure 2 - Months of intensive kidding in the study area  
45  
40  
35  
30  
25  
20  
15  
10  
5
0
In adequate feed and  
water supply  
Inconvenient climatic  
condition  
Disease and parasite  
burdens  
Lack of breeding male  
Drought in the area  
Figure 3 - Major problems in the breeding objectives those hindering productivity of goats  
287  
Citation: Golla K, Mekuriaw Y, Kassa B, Hailemelekot M (2020). On-farm monitoring of growth performance of indigenous goat in Amhara region of Ethiopia. Online J.  
Growth performance, pre-weaning weight and survival rate of goats  
The overall birth weight of kids was 1.69±0.08 kg and there was statistically significantly difference among agro-  
ecologies where higher birth weight was obtained from midland (Table 11). The overall 60 and 90 days weight of kids was  
7.45±0.41 kg and 12.02±0.25 kg (Table 11). This result was higher than Agraw (2010) for highland goats and lower than  
the report of Zeleke (2007) for Somali goat kids and Tesfaye (2009) for goats at Metema district. Comparable results  
environment difference.  
As indicated in the table above (Table 11), birth weight, 60 days and 90 days weight was influenced by the  
independent variables of agro-ecology, sex, parity and birth type. Similarly, significant effect of parity, sex and birth weight  
was also reported by Tesfaye (2009). Kids born at midland and lowland had better weight and also Survival rate. The 90  
days weight was higher in the midland agro-ecologies than the others, which might be due to the presence of optional  
feed staffs from crop production. As a normal physiology, males had received higher birth weight, 60 days and 90 days  
weight. Kids born from parity 3 does had receive better birth, 60 and 90 days weight, this might be due to the act that  
does of these parity had better reproductive physiology both in uterine and mammary system.  
Kids born at midland and lowland had better weight and also Survival rate. The 90 days weight was higher in the  
midland agro-ecologies than the others, which might be due to the presence of optional feed staffs from crop production.  
As a normal physiology, males had received higher birth weight, 60 days and 90 days weight. Kids born from parity 3 does  
had receive better birth, 60 and 90 days weight, this might be due to the act that does of these parity had better  
reproductive physiology both in uterine and mammary system. The survival rate of the current monitoring was 74%. And  
the result was higher than Belay and Mengistie (2013) for Abergelle goats reported as 69% and 57% for the Borana kids  
and comparable with Arsi-Bale kids which was 75%.  
Table 11 - Birth weight, weaning weight and 90 days weight of goats in the study area  
Factors  
Over all  
Agro ecology  
Highland  
Mid land  
Lowland  
Parity  
1
N
Birth weight  
1.69±0.08  
*
1.56±0.17b  
1.69±0.17a  
1.65±0.13ab  
**  
1.64±0.08b  
1.69±0.07ab  
1.79±0.21a  
1.72±0.11ab  
*
N
60 days weight  
7.45±0.41  
NS  
90 days weight  
12.02±0.25  
***  
9.60±0.228b  
12.53±0.151a  
10.38±0.754ab  
**  
12.22±.31b  
12.53±.29ab  
13.03±.34a  
13.03±0.34a  
NS  
60  
52  
20  
20  
20  
16  
19  
17  
7.42±0.21  
7.54±0.04  
7.51±0.07  
*
7.63 ± 0.32a  
7.18 ± 0.07a  
7.74 ± 0.07a  
6.45 ± 0.07b  
*
14  
21  
9
12  
16  
9
2
3
>4  
16  
15  
Sex  
Male  
21  
39  
1.71±0.10  
1.62±0.11  
**  
20  
32  
7.16 ± 0 .28  
6.86 ± 0.25  
*
12.01±0.27  
11.03±0.28  
**  
Female  
Birth type  
Single  
42  
18  
1.79±0.18  
1.59±0.08  
39  
13  
7.75 ± 0.40  
6.64 ± 0.17  
12.53±0.151  
10.38±0.754  
Multiple  
CONCLUSION  
Based on the husbandry practice adopted by the area, the production system of the survey district was characterized by  
mixed crop-livestock farming system on which crop residue was the main feed source of the goats as well as the other  
livestock species. The majority of the households do not possess private grazing land, which confirms that the goat  
production is mainly dependent on grazing/browsing and crop residues. Improvement of productive performance of goats  
need follow up and continuous evaluation of herd productive performance which allow to understand the major  
environmental factors to arrange continuous feeding and health monitoring in the flock. The monitoring data also  
indicated that, reproductive performance and birth weight of the kids was affected by agro-ecology and other factors;  
these facts assure improvement and designing the production system in the scientific way of goat production will improve  
the performance and income level of the farmer. As shown in the paper the goat production system is constrained by  
different problems those affect the breeding program and production potential, which shows the production system in the  
area is neglected and less attention was given for goat production. While other figures like the reproductive performance  
shows better result that indicate as the breed had better potential compared with other goat breeds of the country.  
288  
Citation: Golla K, Mekuriaw Y, Kassa B, Hailemelekot M (2020). On-farm monitoring of growth performance of indigenous goat in Amhara region of Ethiopia. Online J.  
DECLARATIONS  
Recommendations  
As interlinked problems were reported by the result, more emphasis on improvement of the feeding practice,  
health monitoring and breeding program needs to be placed on the improvement of the productive and reproductive  
performance of goats.  
Characterization of the breed in the study area should better be conducted to well understand the potential of the  
breed and to set further conservation strategies.  
Conflict of interests  
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.  
Authors’ contribution  
All authors contributed equally to this research work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.  
REFERENCES  
Abraham H, Gizaw S, and Urge M. (2018). Identification of breeding objectives for Begait goat in western Tigray, North Ethiopia. Tropical  
Animal Health and Production, 50: 18871892. Google Scholar ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1640-5  
Agraw A (2010). Phenotypic Characterization and Husbandry Practices of North-Western Highland Goats In West Gojjam Zone Of Amhara  
Region, Ethiopia. MSc thesis submitted to Bahir Dar University. Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.  
Alemayehu K, and Kebede D (2017). Evaluation of Morphometric and Reproductive Traits of Indigenous Dairy Goat Types in North Western  
Amhara, Ethiopia. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 7(1), 45-51. Google Scholar ; Link  
Assefa G, Hilemelekot M, Taye M, Wuletaw Z and Tesfa A (2015). A Survey on breeding practice, and productive performance of simada  
cattle in tach gayint district, Ethiopia. Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine, 5 (6): 171-180. Google Scholar ; Link  
Belay D and Mengistie T (2013). Evaluation of Growth Performance of Abergele Goats under Traditional Management Systems in Sekota  
District, Ethiopia. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 16: 692-696. Google Scholar ; Link  
Bett B, Kiunga P, Gachohi J, Sindato C, Mbotha D, Robinson T, Lindahl J, and Grace D (2017). Effects of climate change on the occurrence  
and distribution of livestock diseases. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 137(Pt B):119129. Google Scholar  
; DOI:  
ESGPIP (2008). “Ethiopia Sheep and Goat Productivity Improvement Program”, Sheep and Goat Production Handbook for Ethiopia, Alemu  
Yami and R C Merkel (Eds.), pp. 5-26, Brana Printing Press, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Google Scholar  
FAO (1999). Production Year Book: Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). 52, Rome, Italy. Google Scholar  
Getahun K (2008). Productive and Economic Performance of Small Ruminants in Town Production Systems of the Highlands of Ethiopia,  
Doctoral Thesis, Hohenheim University, Cuvllier Verlag, Gottingen, Germany. Google Scholar  
Girma A, Merkel R and Tilahun S (2000). Enhancing food security and income generation potential of families in southern Ethiopia through  
improved goat production and extension. In: Markel, R.C., Girma Abebe. And Goetsch, A.L (eds), The opportunities and challenges of  
enhancing goat production in East Africa: Proceeding of a conference held at Awassa, Debub University. pp. 113117. Google  
Kahi A, and Wasike C (2019). Dairy goat production in sub-Saharan Africa: current status, constraints and prospects for research and  
development.  
Asian-Australasian  
Journal  
of  
Animal  
Sciences,  
32(8):1266-1274.  
;
DOI:  
Mayberry D, Ash A, Prestwidge D, and Herrero M (2018). Closing yield gaps in smallholder goat production systems in Ethiopia and India.  
Mohamed M, Bezabih E, Jabbar M and Ehui S (2002). Analysis of Economic and Nutritional Impacts of Market-oriented dairy production in  
the Ethiopian highlands. Forth Coming,Socio-economic and Policy Working Paper International Livestock Research Institute ILRI,  
Livestock Policy Analysis. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Google Scholar  
Sheriff O, Alemayehu K and Haile A (2020). Production systems and breeding practices of Arab and Oromo goat keepers in northwestern  
Ethiopia: implications for community-based breeding programs. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 52(3): 14671478. Google  
Solomon A, Girma A and Kassahun A (2008). Sheep and Goat Production Systems in Ethiopia in: Alemu Yami and Merkel R.C. Sheep and  
Goat Production Handbook for Ethiopia, ESGPIP. Ethiopian Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Ethiopia, 28-32. Link  
Tesfahun B, Kebede K and Effa K (2017). Traditional goat husbandry practice under pastoral systems in South Omo zone, southern  
Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 49: 625632. Google Scholar ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1240-9.  
Tesfaye T (2009). Characterization of goat production systems and on- farm evaluation of the growth performance of grazing goats  
supplemented with different protein sources in Metema Woreda, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. MS Thesis. Haramaya University,  
Haramaya, Ethiopia. Google Scholar  
Wondwosen K (2007). Husbandry practices of goats in Dalocha district, Southern Ethiopia. MSc. thesis submitted to Haramaya University.  
Zeleke M (2007). Environmental influences on pre-weaning growth performance and mortality rates of extensively managed Somali goats  
in Eastern Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 19: Article #186. Link  
289  
Citation: Golla K, Mekuriaw Y, Kassa B, Hailemelekot M (2020). On-farm monitoring of growth performance of indigenous goat in Amhara region of Ethiopia. Online J.