Volume 10, Issue 6: 321-325; November 27, 2020  
PREVALENCE OF GASTROINTESTINAL PARASITES IN  
CAMEL IN POTENTIAL AREAS OF ETHIOPIA (THE CASE OF  
AFAR REGIONAL STATE)  
Endris F. AHMED1 , Weldegebrial G. AREGAWI2, Beksisa URGE3 and Medina ENDRIS4  
1Afar Pastoral and Agro-pastoral Research Institute, P.O. Box 16, Samara, Afar, Ethiopia  
2Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Mehoni Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Box , 47, Mekhoni, Tigray, Ethiopia  
3Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia  
4Semera Regional Veterinary laboratory, Afar, Semera, P.O. Box 33, Semera, Afar, Ethiopia  
Email: endrisf@yahoo.com  
Supporting Information  
ABSTRACT: A cross sectional study was conducted from April, 2017 to October, 2018 to determine the  
prevalence of gastrointestinal tract (GIT) helminthes and protozoan parasites in relation to contributing risk  
factors in camels of afar region. Accordingly, a total of 407 camels were examined. Random and purposive  
sampling was made in the respective districts for screening of camels. Fecal samples were collected and  
processed by sedimentation and floatation methods. The coprological finding indicated that about 30.22% (n =  
123) of the camels harbored and excreted helminthes and protozoan parasites. Of which, the prevalence of  
nematodes, protozoa, cestodes, and trematodes were 144 (35.38%), 28 (22.76%), 8 (6.50%) and 5 (4.07%),  
respectively. The most frequently encountered parasites were Strongylus sp. 68 (55.28%), Trichuris sp. 40  
(32.52%) Strongyloides sp. 36 (29.27%), Coccidia 28 (22.76%), Moniezia 8 (6.50%), and Paraphystomum 5  
(4.07%), respectively. 17.44% of the cases were single infection while 10.57% were mixed infections. Age and  
body condition of the animals were significantly associated (P<0.05) with the occurrence of parasites. In  
conclusion, gastrointestinal parasites are the major health problems of camel in the study areas. Therefore, it is  
important to undertake the detailed epidemiological investigations such as seasonal dynamics, fecal culture for  
larvae recovery and species identification to generate parasite mitigation methods.  
Keywords: Afar region, Camel, Gastrointestinal parasite, Prevalence, Risk factors.  
INTRODUCTION  
Camel is anatomically and physiologically well adapted to harsh climatic conditions of desert. They are valued as riding,  
baggage, drought animal as well as best food provider in the arid areas. Camels are important milk producers in arid  
lands and camel milk is an essential food for livelihood of people and it may be the only milk available in places where  
other milking animals cannot be maintained (Hoter et al., 2019). Camel is an important animal component of the fragile  
desert eco-system, with its unique bio-physiological characteristics, thus, has become an icon of adaptation to challenging  
ways of living in arid and semi-arid regions (Bikaner, 2008; Burger et al., 2019).  
The production, productivity and health of camel are affected by several factors. Parasites and parasite borne  
diseases are the major constraints in improvement production and productivity efficiency (Djerbouh et al., 2018; Desta,  
2019). Among important camel health problems, different types of gastrointestinal (GIT) parasites over emphasize camel  
production in the study areas (Barji et al., 2010).  
Notwithstanding the immense action made to control GIT Parasitosis, farmers in Ethiopia continue to incur  
significant losses due to insufficient availability of information and best practices on the epidemiology of the GIT  
parasites (Fentahun, 2020). GIT parasites are associated stunted growth rate, weight loss, copious diarrhea, reduced feed  
Despite these facts, information about the occurrence and species composition of GIT parasites of camel is limited  
in Afar region of Northern Ethiopia. This study were therefore conducted to generate recent information on the occurrence  
321  
Citation: Ahmed EF, Aregawi WG, Urge B and Endris M (2020). Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in camel in potential areas of Ethiopia (the case of Afar regional  
and species diversity of camel GIT parasites, identify risk factors associated with the occurrence of GIT parasites, and to  
recommend an appropriate helminthes control and prevention options that could be used in the camel rearing areas.  
MATERIALS AND METHODS  
Study area  
The study was conducted from April to October 2018 in selected districts of Afar region. Afar National Regional  
State is one of the nine federal states of Ethiopia located in the northeastern part of the country 588 kms far from the  
capital. The total geographical area of the region is about 270,000 km2. It is geographically located between 39o34’ and  
42o28’ East Longitude and 8o49’and 14o30’North Latitude. The climate in most of the region is hot with maximum  
0
0
temperature of 45 C in August and minimum temperature of 20 C in January. The altitude ranges from 116 m below  
sea level to 1500 m above sea level. The region has an area of Low Land, with an irregular drainage system and  
depression, which, is 114 m below sea level as well as some of the exposed rocks. 35.47 % of the region has an elevation  
less than 400 m above sea level whereas 51.44% has an elevation between 400 to 900 and 13.09 % has an elevation  
above 900 m above sea level. The region has a number of perennial rivers that include Awash, Mille, Kesem Kebena,  
Awura, Gulina, Dewe, Borkena, Telalak, and numerous seasonal rivers that flows to different basins. In the region there  
are also a number of lakes, such as Lake Asahle, Lake Dalol, Lake Afdera, Lake Abe, and Lake Gemeri are some  
examples of the lakes in the region. The study was conducted in seven districts of afar national regional state namely  
Chifra, Erebti, Burimodayito, Gewane, Dalifage, Yallo and Elidar which are potential areas for camel.  
Study animals  
The study was conducted on traditionally managed camel herd selected from seven districts (Chifra, Gewane, Bure  
Mudaytu, Elidar, Yalo, Dalifage and Megale) of Afar region. For the prevalence study, age groups and sexes were randomly  
selected from the selected herds. Due to the absence of written records, the age of animal was determined by dentition.  
Study animal related information of each sampled camel such as sex, age and body condition score were collected at the  
time of the study. Camel breeds in Ethiopia are one humped which are categorized under camellus dromedarous breed.  
Animals that had not treated for internal parasites for at least two months during the study were considered for sampling.  
Study design  
A cross sectional study design was used to determine the occurrence and prevalence of GIT parasites in the selected  
districts. From each selected district two peasant associations (PAs) or kebeles were selected giving a total of 14 kebelles  
from the entire five zones of the region. The study districts and kebeles were selected based on the inclusion criteria such  
as potential camel population, accessibility, and willingness of the pastoralists to participate in the study.  
Sample size determination  
Sample size was determined according to Thrusfield (2005) using an average expected prevalence rate of 50% (as  
there was no previous report in the districts), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and 5% desired accuracy. Accordingly a total of  
384 animals were calculated to be included in the study. However, the sample size for GIT parasites was inflated to 407 in  
order to increase the representativeness of the samples to the wider population. Sampling animals were proportionally  
distributed to the selected districts and PAs based on their camel population.  
Laboratory analysis  
The fecal samples were collected per rectum with new, unused gloves for each animal. Collected samples were put  
into fecal pots, labeled and kept cool prior to transportation to the laboratory where they were immediately examined or  
stored at refrigerated temperature (4 °C) for a maximum of one day before processing. The sedimentation and floatation  
techniques as described by Hansen and Perry (1994) were used for parasite examination. Identification of eggs of each  
species of camel parasites were done according to the procedure described by Soulsby (1982) and Urquhart et al. (1987).  
Data analysis  
The collected data were entered and coded to computer using excel spreadsheets and analysis was carried out using  
STATA, version 11. The prevalence (p) calculated as p = d/n, where d is the number of camels diagnosed as having a  
given parasite egg/oocyst at that point in time and n = number of camels at risk at that point in time. Descriptive  
statistics was used to show the frequencies and chi square analysis was used to identify factors associated with the  
occurrence of parasites. The level of significance was set at P<0.05.  
RESULTS  
Of 407 fecal samples examined, a total of 123 were found positive for at least one GIT parasite giving an overall  
prevalence of 30.22% (123/407). Positive camels were harbored and excreted helminthes and/or protozoan parasites.  
The prevalence of nematodes, protozoa, cestodes, and trematodes were 144 (35.4%), 28 (6.9%), 8 (1.97%) and 5  
(1.23%), respectively (Table 1). Of the 132 positive facial samples, six types of helminthes/protozoan parasites  
322  
Citation: Ahmed EF, Aregawi WG, Urge B and Endris M (2020). Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in camel in potential areas of Ethiopia (the case of Afar regional  
eggs/oocyst encountered in descending order of prevalence were Strongylus sp. 68 (55.28%), Trichuris 40 (32.52%),  
Strongyloides sp. 36 (29.27%), Coccidia 28 (22.76%), Moniezia 8 (6.50%), and Paraphystomum 5 (4.07%). Majority of the  
GIT parasite infection type were occurred in single (17.44%), while the remaining occurred in mixed infections with two  
(10.56 %), three (1.97%) and four (0.25%) parasites (Tables 2 and 3).  
The occurrence of camel GIT helminthes in the present study was significantly influenced by age and body condition  
(P<0.005), where significantly higher prevalence were observed in adult animals than young, and in animals with poor  
body condition than in animals with poor body condition (Table 4). Sex wise, the prevalence of GIT parasites in female and  
male camels were 96 (23.59%) and 27 (6.63%), respectively there was no significant variations. In addition, there were  
no significant differences in the prevalence of camel GIT infection among the selected study districts (P>5%). Of the  
selected six districts higher camel GIT prevalence was observed in Gewane (5.65%) followed by Yalo and Megale with  
4.9% prevalence rates in both districts (Table 4).  
Table 1 - Prevalence of camel GIT parasites in selected districts of Afar region  
Parasite category  
Parasite species  
Positive number  
Prevalence (%)  
Strongylus  
Trichuris  
68  
40  
36  
16.7  
9.83  
8.85  
Nematodes  
Protozoan  
Strongyloides  
Coccidia  
28  
6.9  
Ceastode  
Moniezia  
8
5
1.9  
Trematodes  
Paraphystomum  
1.23  
Table 2 - Species of camel GIT parasite infection identified and their prevalence in selected districts of Afar region  
Prevalence  
Infection type (N)  
Family/ies  
Species  
Frequency  
Percentage  
(%)  
(N)  
22  
21  
4
16  
6
Strongylus  
Strongyloides  
Trichuris  
Coccidia  
5.41  
5.16  
0.98  
3.93  
Nematode  
Single (71)  
Protozoan  
Cestode  
Monezia  
1.47  
Trematode  
Paramphistomum  
Strongyloides & Coccidia  
Paramphistomum & Strogylus  
Strongyiodes & Strongylus  
Strongyloides & Trichuris  
Strongylus & Coccidia  
Strongylus & Trichuris  
2
1
0.49  
0.25  
Nematode and Protozoan  
Trematode and Nematode  
Nematode  
Nematode  
Nematode and Protozoan  
Nematode  
2
2
5
11  
22  
0.49  
0.49  
1.23  
2.70  
5.40  
Two parasite (43)  
Three parasite (8)  
Cestode & Nematode  
Trematode and Nematode  
Nematode  
Monezia, Strongylus & Trichuris  
1
1
6
0.25  
0.25  
1.47  
Paramphistomum, Strongylus & Trichuris  
Srongylus, Trichuris & Strongyloides  
Four parasite  
(1)  
Strongylus, Trichuris, Monezia &  
Strongyloid  
Nematode & Cestode  
1
0.25  
Total  
123  
30.22  
Table 3 - Prevalence of camel GIT parasites observed in single and mixed infestation in selected districts of Afar region  
Infection type  
Frequency (N)  
Percentage (%)  
Single  
71  
43  
8
17.44  
10.57  
1.97  
Two parasite  
Three parasite  
Four parasite  
1
0.24  
323  
Citation: Ahmed EF, Aregawi WG, Urge B and Endris M (2020). Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in camel in potential areas of Ethiopia (the case of Afar regional  
Total  
123  
30.22  
Table 4 - Prevalence of Camel GIT parasites in relation to hypothesized risk factors  
Risk factors  
Sex  
No. examined  
No. positive  
Prevalence (%)  
X2 (p-value)  
Female  
Male  
332  
75  
96  
27  
98  
25  
17  
106  
16  
23  
14  
14  
20  
16  
20  
123  
23.59  
6.63  
24.08  
6.14  
4.18  
26.04  
3.93  
5.65  
3.44  
3.44  
4.91  
3.93  
4.91  
30.22  
5.41 (0.228)  
Adult  
324  
83  
Age  
8.62 (0.0005)  
10.13(0.000)  
Young  
Good  
280  
127  
52  
Body condition  
score  
Poor  
Chifra  
Gewane  
Bure Mudaytu  
Elidar  
60  
51  
Districts  
55  
7.92 (0.84)  
Yalo  
60  
Dalifage  
Megale  
70  
59  
Total  
407  
DISCUSSION  
Camel parasites are the most important camel health problems in Afar region of Ethiopia. The current finding indicated  
that the overall prevalence of camle GIT parasite was 30.22% in the selected study districts. The dominat parasites  
identified in the area were Strongylus sp. 68 (55.28%), Trichuris 40 (32.52%) Strongyloides sp. 36 (29.27%), Coccidia 28  
(22.76%), Moniezia 8 (6.50%), and Paraphystomum 5 (4.07%) in descenmding order. Single parasitism (17.44%) and  
mixed infection 10.46 %, was recorded in the camel rearing areas. The result was in line with the findings of Bekele,  
(2002). However, the present finding was lower than the studies of Mohammed et al. (2008) who reported 91.5%  
prevalence rate of GIT parasites in camel.  
This difference might be related to differences in the management practices and microclimates of the study areas.  
The study revealed adult camels (24.08%) were more prone to infection than young camels. This finding was consistent  
with the study of Mohmuda et al. (2007), who reported an increasing rate of infection with age of camels. The variations  
could be exposure risk of adult camels due to physiological differences, such as stress, pregnancy, lambing, inadequate  
nutrition, and infectious diseases. In addition, a significantly higher GIT parasite prevalence was observed in camels with  
poor body condition than in camels in good body condition. This could be due to the impact of the parasites that causes  
weight loss, copious diarrhea and reduced feed intake.  
The distribution of parasites among the different districts of the study was not significantly different which could be  
due to similarity on the management system of the animals across the region. The study also showed no significant  
differences between the two sexes. However, female camels (23.59%) were more vulnerable to parasites than male  
camels (6.63%). The probable reason could be stress factors that reduce immunity of female camels to infections  
(Magzoub et al., 2000). Similar results were also reported by other authors (Valcarcel and Romero, 1999). On contrarily,  
Gulland and Fox (1992), reported higher rate of infection in male than female camels.  
CONCULUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS  
The study showed that gastro-intestinal parasites were prevalent in the study areas. The current finding indicated that the  
overall prevalence of camel gastro-intestinal tract parasite was 30.22% in the study districts. The dominant parasites  
identified in the area were Strongylus sp. 68(55.28%), Trichuris 40 (32.52%) Strongyloides sp. 36 (29.27%), Coccidia 28  
(22.76%), Moniezia 8 (6.50%), and Paraphystomum 5 (4.07%) in descending order. single parasitism (17.44%) and mixed  
infection 10.46 %, was recorded in the camel rearing areas. Therefore, it is important to undertake the detailed  
epidemiological investigations such as seasonal dynamics, fecal culture for larvae recovery and species identification to  
generate parasite mitigation methods.  
DECLARATIONS  
Acknowledgements  
The authors acknowledge livestock owners, communities and officials in the study districts for their unreserved co-  
operation and assistance during field work.  
324  
Citation: Ahmed EF, Aregawi WG, Urge B and Endris M (2020). Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in camel in potential areas of Ethiopia (the case of Afar regional  
Authors’ contribution  
All authors contributed equally to this research work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.  
Availability of data and materials  
Data will be made available up on request of the primary author.  
Consent to publish  
Not applicable.  
Competing interests  
The data can be available to the journal upon request.  
Conflict of interest  
The authors declare they have no competing of interests.  
REFERENCE  
Bekele T (2002). Epidemiological studies on GIT helminths of dromedary in semi-arid .lands of eastern Ethiopia. Veterinary  
Parasitology, 105: 139-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00583-0  
Bikaner Website (2008). Online Article on Camel, National Research Center on Camel, Jorbeer, Bikaner (Rajasthan) India.  
Borji H, Razmi G, Movassaghi AR, (2010): A study on gastrointestinal helminths of camels in Mashhad abattoir Iran. Iranian  
journal  
of  
Veterinary  
Research,  
11:  
174-179.  
Burger PA, Ciani E, and Faye B (2019). Old world camels in a modern world - a balancing act between conservation and  
genetic improvement. Animal Genetics, 50(6): 598612. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12858  
Central Statistical Agency. (2009): Animal population census in Afar region. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.  
Desta AH (2019). Major helminth parasites of camelus dromedarius in afar pastoral area of Ethiopia. Iraqi Journal of  
Veterinary Sciences, 33: 117-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33899/ijvs.2019.125524.1046  
Djerbouh A, Lafri I, Kechemir-Issad N and Bitam I (2018). Endo- and ectoparasites (Ixodidae) of camels (Camelus  
dromedarius) from Southern Algeria. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 30: Article #141.  
Fentahun T (2020). Systematic review on gastrointestinal helminths of domestic ruminants in Ethiopia. Online Journal of  
Animal and Feed Research, 10(5): 216-230. Link  
Gulland F and Fox M (1992): Epidemiology of Nematode Infections of Soay on St. Kilda. Parasitology, 105(3): 481-492.  
Hansen and Perry J, and B. Perry (1994). Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Control of Helminthes Parasites of Ruminants 2nd  
Ed. Nairobi, Kenya, Hrad, ISBN: 92-9055-703-1., Pp. 171. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8599-7895 I Google Scholar  
Hoter A, Rizk S, and Naim HY (2019). Cellular and molecular adaptation of arabian Camel to heat stress. Frontiers in  
Magzoub M, Omer OH, HarouMagzoub EM, Omer M, Haroun OH, and Mahmoud OM (2000) Effect of season on  
gastrointestinal nematode infection in Saudi Arabian camels (Camelus dromedarius). Journal of Camel Practice  
Research, 7 (1): 107-108. Google Scholar  
Mohamed AM, Mahmoud R, Abdella GA. and Abou EE. (2008). The influence of Some Nematode Parasitism on Lipid  
Metabolism and Lipoprotein Profile in Dromedary Camel. Journal of Camel Science, 1: 63-67.  
Llink:  
Mohammed AK, Sackey AKB, and Gefu AO (2007). Common health problems of the one humped camel (Camelus  
dromedarius) introduced into sub-humid climate in Zaria, Nigeria. Research Journal of Animal Sciences, 1(1): 1-5.  
SOULSBY EJL (1982). Helminths. Arthropods and Protozoa of Domestic Animals, 7th Ed. Bailliere Tindall, London, UK,  
Thrusfield M (2005). Veterinary Epidemiology. 3rd edition, Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, London. UK. pp. 234-238. Google  
Urge B, Mark T, and Siyoum T (2020). Identifying Helminthes Infection in Calves Reared by Smallholder Farmers in Central  
Areas of Ethiopia. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 3: 9-15.  
Urquhart GM, Armour J, and Duncan JL (1987). Veterinary Parasitology 3rd End. Long man Scientific and Technical Burnt  
Mill, Harlow, UK. pp. 238. Google Scholar  
I
Valcarcel F and Romero CG (1999). Prevalence and Seasonal Pattern of Trichostrongylus in a Dry Area Central Spain.  
Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B, 46(10): 673-681. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0450.1999.00297  
I
325  
Citation: Ahmed EF, Aregawi WG, Urge B and Endris M (2020). Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in camel in potential areas of Ethiopia (the case of Afar regional